Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Grant Anderson v. Department of Public Safety & Corrections
as 24-1339
Plaintiff:
GRANT ANDERSON
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORRECTIONS, STATE OF MARYLAND and PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF OF POLICE
Grant Anderson v. Maryland Attorney General
as 23-7273
Petitioner / Appellant:
GRANT ANDERSON, a/k/a Jibril Luqman Ibrahim
Respondent / Appellee:
MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL
Anderson v. Department of Public Safety & Corrections et al
as 8:2022cv02470
Plaintiff:
Grant Anderson, Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety & Corrections, State Of Maryland and Prince Georges Co. Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Anderson v. Maryland Attorney General
as 1:2022cv02392
Petitioner:
Grant Anderson and Jibril Luqman Ibrahim
Respondent:
Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kari Aanenson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05047
Plaintiff:
Lori Stolle, Kari Aanenson, Michael Abel and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Aanenson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00838
Plaintiff:
Lori Stolle, Kari Aanenson, Michael Abel and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Aanenson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00838
Plaintiff:
Aanenson, Lori Stolle, Kari Aanenson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Grant Anderson v. USA
as 21-5142
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Petitioner / Appellant:
Grant Anderson
ANDERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv00790
Petitioner:
GRANT ANDERSON, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
ANDERSON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2020cv02899
Plaintiff:
GRANT ANDERSON, JR.
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
