Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Adams et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2026cv04296
Plaintiff:
Gregory Adams and Jasmine Ross
Defendant:
The City of New York, Detective Jacqueline Demerest and NYPD Officers John Doe 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John v. Adams
as 1:2025cv07374
Plaintiff:
Oloruntobi Isaiah John
Defendant:
Gregory Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv08715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdullah et al. v. Indivior Inc., et al.
as 1:2025sf65978
Plaintiff:
Ali Abdullah, Gregory Adams, Sufian Al-Gaithi and others
Defendant:
Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc., F/K/A MonoSol Rx, LLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and Indivior Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilmington Trust, NA v. Green et al
as 3:2025cv00502
Plaintiff:
Wilmington Trust, NA
Defendant:
Janice Green, Unknown Spouse of Janice Green, Victoria Pointe Homeowners Association, Inc. and others
Counter-Claimant:
Janice Green
Counter-Defendant:
Gregory Adam Wallach, Zachary Ullman and Wilmington Trust, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Moussa Diarra v. Latisha Dear Jackson, et al
as 24-3294
Defendant:
LATISHA DEAR JACKSON, Judicial Officer, ROBERT LEONARD, Judicial Officer, GREGORY ADAM, Judicial Officer and others
Plaintiff:
MOUSSA U'NFA DIARRA
Moussa Diarra v. LaTisha Jackson, et al
as 24-13419
Plaintiff:
MOUSSA U'NRA DIARRA
Defendant:
ROBERT LEONARD, DANIEL M. COURSEY, GREGORY ADAM and others
Diarra v. Adam
as 1:2024cv04675
Defendant:
Gregory Adam
Plaintiff:
Moussa U'nfa Diarra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diarra v. Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv04228
Defendant:
Judge Latisha Dear Jackson, ROBERT LEONARD, Daniel M. Coursey and others
Plaintiff:
Moussa U'nfa Diarra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.