Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ditech Financial LLC v. Stokes et al
as 2:2023cv05317
Plaintiff:
Ditech Financial LLC and Green Tree Servicing LLC
Defendant:
Gregory Stokes and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
Gregory Stokes v. Detroit Public Schools
as 19-1773
Defendant / Appellee:
DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY STOKES
Stokes v. Detroit Public Schools
as 2:2017cv13205
Plaintiff:
Gregory Stokes
Defendant:
Detroit Public Schools
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
William Adams v. Gregory Stokes, et al
as 16-16669
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY STOKES, Police Officer and KENNETH KING
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
William Adams v. Gregory Stoke
as 12-13196
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILLIAM ADAMS
Defendant - Appellant:
GREGORY STOKES
Gregory Gabriel v. Alaska Electrical Pension Fund, et al
as 12-35458
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY R. GABRIEL
Defendant - Appellee:
ALASKA ELECTRICAL PENSION FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE ALASKA ELECTRICAL PENSION FUND, PENSION ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE OF THE ALASKA ELECTRICAL PENSION FUND and others
William Adams v. City of Ormond Beach, FL, et al
as 12-10412
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ORMOND BEACH, FLORIDA, a municipal corporation, JOHN DOE NETTERVILLE, badge #51, police officer, GREGORY STOKES, police officer and others
:
SERVICE
William Adams v. City of Ormond Beach, et al
as 11-11792
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ORMOND BEACH, a municipal corporation, JOHN DOE NETTERVILE, Badge #51, police officer, GREGORY STOKES, police officer and others
Adams v. Stokes, et al
as 6:2010cv01104
Plaintiff:
William Adams
Defendant:
City of Ormond Beach, Michael Longfellow, Ormond Beach Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
