Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 296
Moore v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2024cv00403
Plaintiff: Thomas Kevin Moore
Defendant: Gretchen Whitmer and Dana Nessel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Truss v. Whitmer
as 2:2024cv11030
Plaintiff: Earl Flynn Truss, Jr.
Defendant: Gretchen Whitmer
Martin v. Whitmer et al
as 5:2024cv10551
Plaintiff: Christien D. Martin
Defendant: Gretchen Whitmer, Heidi Washington, John Christiansen and others
Martin #794831 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00206
Plaintiff: Christien D. Martin #794831
Defendant: Michigan Department of Corrections, Gretchen Whitmer, Heidi Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin #794831 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff: Christien D. Martin #794831
Defendant: Michigan Department of Corrections, Gretchen Whitmer, Heidi Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owen Barnaby v. MI, et al
as 24-1141
Plaintiff: OWEN W. BARNABY
Defendant: STATE OF MICHIGAN, GRETCHEN WHITMER, Governor, JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM, Former Governor and others
Owen Barnaby v. MI, et al
as 24-1086
Plaintiff: OWEN W. BARNABY
Defendant: STATE OF MICHIGAN, GRETCHEN WHITMER, Governor, JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM, Former Governor and others
Cary v. Whitmer
as 5:2024cv10192
Plaintiff: Bryan Cary
Defendant: Gretchen Whitmer
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431 Fed. Election Commission: Failure Enforce C
Glenn Bowles, et al v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 24-1013
Plaintiff: GLENN BOWLES, KENNETH FRANKS and ROBERT GARDNER
Defendant: GRETCHEN WHITMER and DANA NESSEL
John Doe, et al v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 23-2097
Plaintiff: TIM BROWN, JOHN DOE and TIMOTHY RONALD BROWN
Defendant: ATTORNEY GENERAL DANA NESSEL, ANICA LETICA, ONE COURT OF JUSTICE, Judges and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?