Cases 11 - 20 of 77
Prepared Food Photos, Inc. v. Grubhub Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03197
Plaintiff:
Prepared Food Photos, Inc. fka Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc. and Prepared Food Photos, Inc.
Defendant:
Grubhub Inc. and GrubHub Holdings Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Grubhub, Inc., et al v. Relish Labs LLC, et al
as 22-1950
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GRUBHUB, INC. and TAKEAWAY.COM CENTRAL CORE B.V.
Defendant / Appellant:
RELISH LABS LLC, KROGER COMPANY and KROGER CO.
Route Guidance Systems LLC v. Grubhub Inc.
as 1:2022cv02272
Plaintiff:
ROUTE GUIDANCE SYSTEMS LLC
Defendant:
Grubhub Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183 Patent Infringement
Ameranth, Inc. v. Seamless North America, LLC
as 22-1660
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMERANTH, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
SEAMLESS NORTH AMERICA, LLC and GRUBHUB, INC.
Ameranth, Inc. v. Papa John's USA, Inc.
as 22-1655
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMERANTH, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
PAPA JOHN'S USA, INC., OPENTABLE, INC., SEAMLESS NORTH AMERICA, LLC and others
Ameranth, Inc. v. Grubhub, Inc.
as 22-1661
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMERANTH, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
GRUBHUB, INC.
Grubhub Inc. v. Denise Sznitko
as 2:2022cv01676
Petitioner:
Grubhub Inc.
Respondent:
Denise Sznitko
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award
Levine v. Grubhub Holdings Inc., et al
as 22-1131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN LEVINE, on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated and STEPHEN LEVINE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
GRUBHUB HOLDINGS INC. and GRUBHUB INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00054
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Grubhub Inc. v. City of New York
as 1:2021cv10602
Plaintiff:
Grubhub Inc.
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
