Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Tabitha McKenzie v. Casey Barren, et al
as 24-11106
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CASEY T. BARREN, ERIC LOVE, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
Tabitha McKenzie v. Casey Barren, et al
as 24-10852
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CASEY T. BARREN, ERIC LOVE, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
MCKENZIE v. LOVE et al
as 4:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MEGAN MCKENZIE and CASEY TIDWELL BARREN
Defendant:
ERIC LOVE, RON DESANTIS, NEAL DUNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Gillespie
as 0:2016cv61235
Plaintiff:
Andramedia C. Robinson
Defendant:
Kenneth L. Gillespie, Vicky Plant, Nicolas Lopane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Third District Juvenile Court, et al
as 14-4127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
THIRD DISTRICT JUVENILE COURT, State of Utah, CHILD PROBATION, GUARDIAN AD LITEM'S OFFICE and others
Davis, et al v. Garcia, et al
as 13-4102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELVIN L. DAVIS, SHARON D. DAVIS, KTD, a minor and others
Defendant - Appellee:
WENDY GARCIA, VERONICA KASPRZAK, AMY REED and others
Defendant:
DIANE WILKINS, Judge, ROBERT PARRISH, LAURA THOMPSON and others
Travis et al v. Hollifield et al
as 1:2012cv00160
Plaintiff:
Paul K. Travis, Rhonda A. Travis, K. F. T. and others
Defendant:
Cheryl Hollifield, Amber Mecimore, Joanne Carrico and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis, et al v. Wilkins, et al
as 09-4037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELVIN L. DAVIS, SHARON D. DAVIS, KTD, a minor and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DIANE WILKINS, Judge, ROBERT PARRISH, LAURA THOMPSON and others
KPL et al v. Alabama State Board of Human Resources et al
as 2:2007cv00075
Plaintiff:
KPL and Karl Randolph Lentz
Defendant:
Alabama State Board of Human Resources, Bob Riley, Alabama Department of Human Resources and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
