Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Gaddie v. Knight et al
as 5:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
LaRico Dwayne Gaddie, Sr.
Defendant:
David Knight, Steven Carter, Darryl Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
USA v. Jaymes Gaddis, III
as 23-3173
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAYMES E. GADDIS, III
Gaddis v. Walker et al
as 5:2023cv10023
Plaintiff:
Devante Gaddis
Defendant:
C. Walker, M. Desco, Unknown Bischer and others
Mackey v. Swaney et al
as 6:2022cv00143
Petitioner:
Dynza Mackey
Respondent:
Ray Swaney, A.W. Mabe, Messer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gaddy v. City of Chattanooga et al
as 1:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Carol Gaddy
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga and Hamilton County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rawlings et al v. Marcum et al
as 1:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Lori Rawlings, Adriene Gaddie and Misty Madson
Defendant:
Hack Marcum, Dylan Knifley, Dylan Lile and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Gaddis et al v. Liberty Insurance Corporation
as 1:2021cv00056
Plaintiff:
Aaron Gaddis and Loretta Gaddis
Defendant:
Liberty Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00142
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Joseph Meersman, Jr. v. Regions Morgan Keegan Trust, et al
as 20-6359
Defendant / Appellee:
MELISSA COGAR, Morgan Keagan Investment Officer, MELANIE CAIL, Vice President, REGIONS MORGAN KEEGAN TRUST, and its Trustees and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH PETER MEERSMAN, JR., Beneficiary Trust U/W LA Una Gay Parkes Nielsen, Trust U/A LA Una Gay Parkes Nielsen
Gaddy v. Lee et al
as 3:2020cv00925
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Lee Dotson, (f/n/u) Crawford and others
Plaintiff:
Adayse L. Gaddy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
