Cases 1 - 10 of 182
Hoglan et al v. Soulas et al
as 1:2024mc21627
Plaintiff:
Candyce S Hoglan, Kui Liong Lee, Kiu Liong Lee and others
Defendant:
Nicole Soulas, Frederick Soulas and Jordan Steiner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Gamboa
as 4:2024cv01168
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Maria A. Gamboa a/k/a Maria A. Cantu and d/b/a Micheladas El Norte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wilson v. Gamboa, et al.
as 24-1818
Petitioner:
LUKE NOEL WILSON
Respondent:
MARTIN GAMBOA, Warden, Avenal State Prison and ROB BONTA, Attorney General, State of California
Hill v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-1583
Petitioner:
NATHAN HILL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party:
GAVIN NEWSOM, RALPH DIAZ, Director of CDCR, KEN CLARK, Warden of CSP-Corcoran and others
Felix Gamboa v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2024cv01270
Plaintiff:
Julianna Felix Gamboa
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
United States v. Michael Gamboa
as 24-1387
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael Gerald Gamboa
Yu v. Ndoh, et al.
as 24-958
Petitioner:
DANIEL YU
Respondent:
ROSEMARY NDOH, Warden, MARTIN GAMBOA, Avenal State Prison and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Real Party in Interest
US v. Moises Gamboa
as 24-6123
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MOISES GAMBOA, a/k/a Mo
Cramer v. Director of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
as 23-4437
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW B. CRAMER
Defendant / Appellee:
DIRECTOR OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, WARDEN OF NORTH KERN STATE PRISON, GAMBOA, Correctional Officer and others
GAMBOA v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01253
Petitioner:
MEGHAN GAMBOA
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
