Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 2,038
BATES et al v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv01441
Plaintiff: WARREN BATES and MARY LYNN BATES
Cross Defendant: AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, BROOKWOOD VENTURES, L.P., BW/IP, INC. and others
Defendant: AMERICAN BILTRITE, INC., ATWOOD & MORRILL CO., INC., AURORA PUMP COMPANY and others
Cross Claimant: ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC., FLOWSERVE U.S. INC., GENUINE PARTS COMPANY d/b/a National Automotive Parts Association, a/k/a/ NAPA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Crooks v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2022cv06089
Plaintiff: David Crooks
Defendant: AW Chesterton Company, AO Smith Corporation, ABB Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Stephen C. Peet v. Armstrong International, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv06672
Plaintiff: Stephen C. Peet
Defendant: Armstrong International, Inc., Aurora Pump Company, Cleaver Brooks, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Gardner Denver Inc v. Air Pacific Compressors Inc
as 2:2022cv07665
Plaintiff: Gardner Denver Inc
Petitioner: Atlas Copco Compressors LLC and Atlas Copco North America LLC
Defendant: Accurate Air Engineering, Inc., Air Pacific Compressors Inc doing business as Compressed Air of California and John Lague
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Susan Rogers v. AO Smith Corp, et al
as 22-2592
Plaintiff / Appellant: SUSAN M. ROGERS, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM R. ROGERS, III, DECEASED, AND WIDOW IN HER OWN RIGHT
Defendant / Appellee: AO SMITH CORP, A W CHESTERTON INC, ALLEN BRADLEY CO and others
Defendant: ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO, BEAZER EAST INC, formerly known as KOPPERS, BROUDY SUPPLY and others
Gardner Denver Inc v. Air Pacific Compressors Inc We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00895
Defendant: John Lague, Accurate Air Engineering Inc, Air Pacific Compressors Inc and others
Plaintiff: Gardner Denver Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Pennino et al v. Reilly-Benton Company, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00363
Defendant: Goulds Pumps IPG, LLC, Ingersoll-Rand Company, Industrial Holdings Corporation and others
Cross Defendant: Dana Companies LLC, Honeywell International Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
3Rd Party Defendant: McDermott, Inc., Eagle Inc., Glazer Steel Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Phyllis Pennino, Sally Pennino and Salvador Pennino
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Albert J. Bossier, Jr.
Not Classified By Court: Link-Belt Construction Equipment Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
JOHN FYNES, ET AL v. BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., et al
as 2:2022cv03398
Plaintiff: JOHN FYNES and MARYANN FYNES
Defendant: BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., Bayer Cropscience, INc. (f/k/a Aventis CropScience USA Inc., f/k/a Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company Inc., a/k/a Amchem Products, Inc.) unknown Aventis Cropscience USA Inc. unknown Am, CBS CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, F/K/A VIACOM, INC., SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO CBS CORPORATION, A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, F/K/A WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, GOULDS PUMPS, INC. and others
Cross Defendant: BRAND INSULATIONS, INC., CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.,, CONWED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Wohlfert v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2022cv05040
Plaintiff: Wayne Wohlfert
Defendant: A.W. Chesterton Company, A.O. Smith Corporation, ABB, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
DOUGHERTY et al v. A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv03204
Plaintiff: JAMES EDWARD DOUGHERTY, MICHELE A DOUGHERTY and JAMES EDWARD DOUGHERTY, III
Defendant: A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY, ABB, INC., ALFA LAVAL INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?