Cases 1 - 10 of 358
Haggins, Jr, Garry v. United States of America
as 9:2024cv80394
Plaintiff:
Garry Haggins, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Frost v. Davenport et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Jared Dakota Frost
Defendant:
Jennifer Davenport, Byron Oliver, Alan Smitherman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haggins Jr, Garry v. United States Of America
as 9:2024cv80366
Plaintiff:
Garry Haggins, Jr
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Deandre Arnold v. Hillsborough County Sheriff, et al
as 24-10634
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE ARNOLD
Defendant:
CHAD CHRONISTER, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SHERIFF, ADRIEL GONZALES and others
HAGGINS v. USA
as 7:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
GARRY HAGGINS, JR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
The Filta Group, Inc. v. Garry et al
as 6:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
The Filta Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Patrick Michael Garry and MMG Enterprise, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
The Filta Group, Inc. v. Garry et al
as 6:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
The Filta Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Patrick Michael Garry and MMG Enterprise, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Arnold v. Chronister et al
as 8:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Deandre Arnold
Defendant:
Sheriff Chad Chronister, Deputy Adriel Gonzales, Deputy Baez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Filta Group, Inc. v. Garry et al
as 6:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
The Filta Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Patrick Michael Garry and MMG Enterprise, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
