Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Losey et al v. BB Locksmith, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00029
Plaintiff:
Mark Losey , Susan Nelson and Gary Dickson
Defendant:
BB Locksmith, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Dickson et al v. American Medical Systems
as 2:2013cv23599
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Dickson and Gary Dickson
Defendant:
American Medical Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DICKSON et al v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS et al
as PAE/2:13-cv-05272
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY DICKSON and GARY DICKSON
Defendant:
AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS
DICKSON et al v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS et al
as 2:2013cv05272
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY DICKSON and GARY DICKSON
Defendant:
AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Official Committee v. Lamar Berry, et al
as 10-30141
Debtor - (null):
In the Matter of: DAGWOODS SANDWICH SHOPPE, L.L.C.
Appellee:
OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS, on behalf of Bankruptcy Estate of Dagwood's Sandwich Shoppe, L.L.C., LAMAR BERRY, DEAN YOUNG and others
Appellant:
GREENWICH INSURANCE CO
Official Committee v. Lamar Berry, et al
as 09-61
Plaintiff - Respondent:
OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS, on behalf of Bankruptcy Estate of Dagwood's Sandwich Shoppe, L.L.C.
Defendant - Petitioner:
GREENWICH INSURANCE CO
Defendant - Respondent:
LAMAR BERRY, DEAN YOUNG, ROBERT MYERS and others
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. Berry et al
as 2:2009cv00287
Plaintiff:
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors and others
Defendant:
Lamar Berry, Dean Young, Robert Myers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DICKSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON LONG TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE PLAN et al
as 3:2008cv02400
Plaintiff:
GARY DICKSON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON LONG TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE PLAN, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and REED GROUP INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
