Cases 1 - 10 of 115
Jenkins v. Hetzel, et al. (INMATE 3)
as 1:2014cv00140
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Jenkins
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pearson v. Hetzel, et al. (INMATE 3)
as 2:2014cv00100
Plaintiff:
Clinton James Pearson, Jr.
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Washington v. Thomas et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2014cv00060
Plaintiff:
Charlie Washington
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Luther Strange and Gary Hetzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scarver v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2013cv00825
Plaintiff:
Curtis Earl Scarver
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Frazier v. Myers et al (DEATH PENALTY)(JOINT ASSIGN)(MEMBER)
as 2:2013cv00781
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Frazier
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas and Gary Hetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Hetzel (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00556
Plaintiff:
Anthony Patterson
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lanier v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2013cv00524
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lanier
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McLeod v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2013cv00478
Plaintiff:
Jackie McLeod
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonds v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2013cv00203
Plaintiff:
James Willis Bonds
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McQuarley v. Sconyers, et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00200
Plaintiff:
Carlos McQuarley
Defendant:
Kenneth Sconyers, Derrick Carter and Gary Hetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
