Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Jimmy Jones v. Gary Lane
as 13-7243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIMMY D. JONES, a/k/a Jimmy D. Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY LANE, CPL. BETTY RODGERS, LT. LAWRENCE LEVIGNE and others
Defendant:
TIM RILEY, Warden, TYGER RIVER CI, et al., LAURA CALDWELL and others
Rainey v. Riley et al
as 9:2013cv00399
Plaintiff:
Christopher Allan Rainey
Defendant:
Tim Riley, Gary Lane and Barry J Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Minnick v. Newton Correctional Facility Staff et al
as 4:2012cv00475
Plaintiff:
Gary Lane Minnick, II
Defendant:
Newton Correctional Facility Staff, Donna Cook, Kay Kleinschrodt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen Wright v. Jason Webber
as 12-7475
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLEN WRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
JASON WEBBER, RL TURNER, TIM RILEY and others
White v. Riley et al
as 1:2012cv02262
Plaintiff:
James W White
Defendant:
Tim Riley, Gary Lane, Jerry Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jefferson v. Lane
as 6:2012cv00955
Plaintiff:
Antoine Jefferson
Defendant:
Gary Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patrick Guess v. Cecilia Reynold
as 11-7153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK GUESS
Defendant - Appellee:
CECILIA R. REYNOLDS, Warden, Kershaw Correctional Institution, TIMOTHY RILEY, Warden, Tyger River Institution, JON OZMINT, Agency Director and others
Wright v. Webber et al
as 1:2011cv02199
Plaintiff:
Allen Wright
Defendant:
Jason Webber, RL Turner, Tim Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheppard v. Forrest et al
as 4:2011cv00486
Plaintiff:
Dexter Antonio Sheppard
Defendant:
Robert Forrest , Tim Riley , Jon Ozmint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheppard v. Forrest et al
as 5:2011cv00486
Plaintiff:
Dexter Antonio Sheppard
Defendant:
Robert Forrest , Tim Riley , Jon Ozmint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
