Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Williams v. Martin
as 1:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Williams
Defendant:
Gary Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodwin v. Logan County Detention Center et al
as 1:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Goodwin
Defendant:
Logan County Detention Center, Cptn. Frank Sankar and Chief Gary Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Martin et al
as 1:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Williams
Defendant:
Gary Martin and Phil Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Laurel County, KY. et al
as 6:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
David M. Bradley
Defendant:
Laurel County, KY., Jamie Mosley, Gary Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Che-Adkins v. Mosley et al
as 6:2021cv00184
Plaintiff:
Frank Melvin Che-Adkins
Defendant:
Jamie Mosley, Travis Cathers, Shawn Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2017cv00019
Plaintiff:
JEREMY JERMAINE SMITH
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL, GARY MARTIN, STRICKLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young et al v. Scott et al
as 2:2016cv00581
Plaintiff:
Michael George Young, Jr., Steven Tompkins, Rodney Dickerson and others
Defendant:
Mike Scott, FNU Ellengood, Thomas Eberhardt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcus Joseph v. Henry Turbeville
as 15-6935
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS ALBINUS JOSEPH, a/k/a Marcus Albines Joseph, a/k/a Marcus A. Joseph
Defendant - Appellee:
HENRY M. TURBEVILLE, ANNELLE G. POWELL, Magistrate Judge in Clarendon County, GARY MARTIN and others
Joseph v. Turbeville et al
as 2:2015cv00412
Plaintiff:
Marcus Albinus Joseph
Defendant:
Henry M Turbeville, Annelle G Powell, Gary Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gary Lutz v. Valenzuela et al
as 5:2011cv00104
Defendant:
Doe #1, Sinclair and Valenzuela
Plaintiff:
Gary Martin Lutz
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
