Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Moore v. Laurel Police Department
as 23-60643
Plaintiff:
Gary Moore
Defendant:
Laurel Police Department
Balistreri-Amrhein v. Larry Hercules & Law Firm, et al et al
as 4:2023cv00862
Plaintiff:
Darlene C. Balistreri-Amrhein
Defendant:
Larry Hercules & Law Firm, et al, Megan Adeyemo, Roy Mathews and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Balistreri-Amrhein, et al v. Universal Insurance Company of North America, et al
as 4:2023cv00776
Defendant:
CEO Gary Moore, Universal Insurance Company of North America, Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO) and others
Plaintiff:
Darlene C. Balistreri-Amrhein
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Moore v. Laurel Police Department
as 2:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Gary Moore
Defendant:
Laurel Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Moore v. Edgewood LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00144
Plaintiff:
Gary Moore
Defendant:
Edgewood LLC and City of Laurel Tax Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Britt et al v. Gary Moore Trucking, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00132
Plaintiff:
Mitzi Britt
Defendant:
John Doe(s) 1-5, John Doe Entity(ies) 1-5, Gary Moore Trucking, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Moore v. Community Bank
as 2:2018cv00198
Plaintiff:
Gary Moore
Defendant:
Community Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moore v. Security National Life Insurance et al
as 2:2018cv00197
Plaintiff:
Gary Moore
Defendant:
Security National Life Insurance and Brian Ricks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. City of Laurel Tax and Inspection Department et al
as 2:2018cv00191
Plaintiff:
Gary Moore
Defendant:
City of Laurel Tax and Inspection Department and SKL Investment Inc. Edgewood LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gary Moore v. MS Department of Correction
as 16-60501
Petitioner - Appellant:
GARY MOORE
Respondent - Appellee:
RON KING, Superintendent, Mississippi Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
