Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Gayle v. Benton Harbor Area Schools et al
as 1:2023cv01340
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Gayle
Defendant:
Benton Harbor Area Schools, Benton Harbor Area Schools Board of Education, Kelvin Butts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bennett #799595 v. Brown et al
as 1:2023cv00653
Plaintiff:
Marcellous Santa Bennett #799595
Defendant:
Karyn Brown and Gayle Scanlon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. County of Oakland et al
as 2:2021cv12303
Plaintiff:
Gayle Daniels
Defendant:
County of Oakland, Dayna DeMeester, Joshua Wurfel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
North #289996 et al v. Scanlon et al
as 1:2021cv00518
Defendant:
Gayle Scanlon, Darrell M. Steward, M. Burk and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia Thompson, Derrick Lee Smith #267009 and Christopher North #289996
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamay-Batteese v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 3:2020cv11397
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Plaintiff:
Tammy Gayle Lamay-Batteese
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Thompson et al v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2020cv00428
Plaintiff:
Rory C. Gutchak, Kenneth A Thompson, Deanna K. Leslie and others
Defendant:
Robert Gordon, Joneigh S. Khaldun, Dana Nessel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. Gladwin, County of
as 1:2020cv10166
Plaintiff:
Gayle Reid
Defendant:
Gladwin County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gayles #227840 v. Chupailo et al
as 2:2019cv00133
Defendant:
Michael LaCrosse and Unknown Chupailo
Plaintiff:
Darnell Gayles #227840
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harden v. Cross et al
as 2:2019cv11753
Defendant:
Gayle Leach, Dr. Tolsma, Kaszei and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Harden
Abney et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11376
Plaintiff:
Denny Conley, Joe Russell, Scott Saathoff and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
