Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BUTLER v. PENCHISHEN et al
as 5:2022cv03252
Plaintiff:
PATRICK BUTLER
Defendant:
DAVID PENCHISHEN, JAMES KOSTURA, CHRIS GEBHARDT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gebhardt v. Philips North America LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
William Gebhardt
Defendant:
PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS R.S. NORTH AMERICA, LLC., KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v. GEBHARDT et al
as 5:2021cv05213
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN McKENZIE HARRIS
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER GEBHARDT, SCHULTEZ, OFFICER HARING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Donnell et al v. Scranton School District et al
as 3:2020cv00225
Defendant:
Robert Lesh, Tom Schuster, Scranton School District and others
Plaintiff:
Albert P. O'Donnell, Rebecca M. O'Brien and George Gevaras
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GATEWOOD v. LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2018cv01059
Plaintiff:
MARQUICE GATEWOOD
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, CHERYL STEBERGER, JENKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Gebhardt v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2015cv01724
Plaintiff:
John Harry Gebhardt
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01487
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor In Possession:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
GEBHARDT v. AW CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv93716
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN GEBHARDT
Defendant:
AW CHESTERTON COMPANY, CBS CORPORATION, DURABLA MANUFACTURING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
GEBHARDT v. BARNHART
as 2:2007cv00572
Plaintiff:
KRISTIN GEBHARDT
Defendant:
JO ANNE BARNHART, JO ANNE BARNHART and JO ANNE BARNHART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
