Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Martin v. GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 3:2023cv14122
Plaintiff:
Gene Martin
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, Patheon Inc., Pfizer Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martin v. Wheelright
as 1:2022cv02793
Plaintiff:
David Gene Martin
Defendant:
Hollie G. Wheelright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Orso v. Martin
as 8:2021mc00051
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Orso as successor trustee to Kenneth D. Bell in his capacity as court appointed receiver for Rex Venture group, LLC doing business as Zeekrewards.com
Defendant:
Gene Martin
Interested Party:
Nationwide Judgment Recovery, Inc.
Martin v. Salmonson
as 9:2018cv00036
Respondent:
James Salmonson
Petitioner:
James Gene Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hamilton et al v. Salmonson
as 6:2018cv00030
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Hamilton, Jeffrey Mills, David Azure and others
Respondent:
James Salmonson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martin et al v. Residential Management Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00781
Plaintiff:
Deborah Regene Martin and Deborah Re gene Martin
Defendant:
Residential Management Systems, Inc. and Richawn Walker
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Burke et al v. THOR Motor Coach, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00075
Plaintiff:
Gene Martin Burke and Virginia Mary Burke
Defendant:
THOR Motor Coach, Inc. and Daimler Trucks North America LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
James Martin v. Martin Frink, et al
as 13-35926
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES GENE MARTIN
Respondent - Appellee:
MARTIN FRINK, TIM FOX and STATE OF MONTANA
Martin v. Frink et al
as 9:2013cv00173
Petitioner:
James Gene Martin
Respondent:
Martin Frink, Tim Fox and State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lasater v. Lasater, Jr.
as 1:2013cv01510
Plaintiff:
J. Scott Lasater
Defendant:
Gene Martin Lasater, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
