Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Joseph Michel v. Cynthia Thornton
as 19-7778
Defendant / Appellee:
CYNTHIA THORNTON, MELANIE SHELTON, JAMIE COBB and others
Defendant:
REGINALD MEWBORN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH F. MICHEL
George Blackmon, Jr. v. Warden, et al
as 18-12507
Petitioner - Appellant:
GEORGE BLACKMON, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Blackmon v. Rahming et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00437
Plaintiff:
George Blackmon, Jr.
Defendant:
Wilcotte Rahming, Alabama Department of Corrections and Kilby Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackmon v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00371
Plaintiff:
George Blackmon, Jr.
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Kilby Correctional Facility and Doctor Ramean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackmon v. Thomas et al
as 2:2018cv00369
Petitioner:
George Blackmon, Jr
Respondent:
Thomas and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Blackmon v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv00249
Plaintiff:
George Blackmon, Jr
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Kilby Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michel v. Thornton et al
as 5:2018ct03008
Plaintiff:
Joseph F. Michel
Defendant:
Cynthia O. Thornton, Melanie Shelton, Jamie Cobb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackmon v. Hale et al
as 2:2017cv02194
Plaintiff:
George Blackmon, Jr
Defendant:
Mick Hale, Brandon Kent Falls, A C Roper and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blevins v. Thornton et al
as 5:2015ct03265
Plaintiff:
Thomas Blevins
Defendant:
Cynthia Thornton, George Blackmon, Jimmy Dorman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blevins v. Unknown Defendant
as 5:2015mc00100
Plaintiff:
Thomas Blevins
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant, Cynthia O. Thornton, George Blackmon and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
