Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Diaz v. The Defendants et al
as 1:2021cv08595
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Diaz
Defendant:
The Defendants, Arlene Goldberg, Vance R. Cyrus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Desmond v. Klopp et al
as 1:2020cv00135
Defendant:
Justin Atherholt, John Doe, Michael Stafford and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Desmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emmons v. Midland County Sheriff's Department
as 7:2019cv00236
Defendant:
Midland County Sheriff's Department, Judge George Gilles and Midland County Texas
Plaintiff:
Steven A. Emmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GILL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv15594
Defendant:
IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE GILL and GEORGE J. GILL
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gill v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv01402
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Gill and George Gill
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caldwell v. Pierce et al
as 1:2016cv00674
Plaintiff:
Fred T. Caldwell
Defendant:
David Pierce, Matthew Dutton, Robert D. Wallis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Damiani v. Gill et al
as 1:2015cv00694
Plaintiff:
Pablo A. Damiani
Defendant:
George Gill, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hutt v. Phelps et al
as 1:2012cv00144
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Hutt
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, George Gill, Vincent May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Gill et al
as 1:2011cv01029
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gordon
Defendant:
George Gill, Michael Deppe and James Scarborough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Barrington Gilling
as 11-14033
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BARRINGTON GEORGE GILLINGS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
