Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Shakur v. Ryan et al
as 4:2018cv00160
Plaintiff:
Amin Rahman Shakur
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, George Herman, Corizon Correctional Healthcare Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez v. Ryan et al
as 2:2012cv00271
Plaintiff:
Sergio Mendez
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, J Freeland, C Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aros #95001 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv02565
Defendant:
Unknown Harris, Unknown Cardenas, Unknown Velasco and others
Plaintiff:
Armando Roberto Aros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weaver v. Ryan, et al.,
as 2:2010cv00717
Plaintiff:
Tim Wesley Weaver
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Unknown Ramos, Jeffrey Freeland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson, et al v. Stewart, et al
as 4:2001cv00545
Petitioner:
Levi Jaimes Jackson
Respondent:
Terry Stewart and George Herman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Trimble v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2009cv02043
Plaintiff:
Randy Trimble
Defendant:
Unknown Party, Mike Montiel, Unknown Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hershfeldt v. Herman, et al
as 2:1998cv00940
Petitioner:
Peter Andrew Hershfeldt
Respondent:
George Herman , Terry L Goddard and Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Ryan, et al
as 2:1998cv01277
Petitioner:
Eric John King
Respondent:
George Herman , Terry L Goddard and Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Djerf v. Ryan, et al
as 2:2002cv00358
Petitioner:
Richard Kenneth Djerf
Respondent:
George Herman and Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Lee, et al v. Ryan, et al
as 2:2001cv02179
Petitioner:
Chad Alan Lee
Respondent:
George Herman and Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
