Cases 31 - 40 of 681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv10587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Electro Medical Technologies LLC v. Napolitano et al
as 2:2013cv00218
Plaintiff:
Electro Medical Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Janet A Napolitano , Alejandro Mayorkas and Gerard Heinauer
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jamshid Irshad v. Janet Napolitano, et al
as 12-3870
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jamshid Irshad
Defendant - Appellee:
Janet Napolitano, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Michael Aytes, Acting Deputy Director of the United States Citzenship & Immigration Services, F. Gerard Heinauer, Director of the Nebraska Service Center and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv08311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02438
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv05021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv03846
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03748
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 jr Judicial Review
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
