Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Tavron v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Marques Tavron
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Mose Jackson, III, M Richarson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Giggleman et al
as 5:2019cv00315
Defendant:
William Giggleman, Donald Compton and Ron Faupel
Plaintiff:
Brad Paul Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stricklin v. Giggleman et al
as 5:2017cv00110
Plaintiff:
Joshua A Stricklin
Defendant:
Giggleman, White and Arkansas Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nicholas Addison v. William Straughn, et al
as 17-1028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nicholas Cortez Addison
Defendant - Appellee:
William Straughn, Warden, Cummins Unit (originally named as Straughn), Louis E. Cogbill, Mental Health Dr., Cummins Unit (originally named as Cosgsbill), Sheila R. Johnson, Sergeant, Cummins Unit (originally named as Shelia Johny) and others
Micah Spence v. Billy Love, et al
as 16-1415
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Micah A. Spence
Defendant - Appellee:
Billy Love, RN, UAMS, Danny Campbell, Medical Staff, UAMS PRI, William Giggleman, Medical Staff, UAMS and others
Spence v. Alston et al
as 4:2014cv00314
Plaintiff:
Micah A Spence
Defendant:
Frederick N Alston, Joshua L Gardner, Tina Helmle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spence v. Love et al
as 4:2014cv00167
Plaintiff:
Micah A Spence
Defendant:
Billy Love, Danny Campbell, William Giggleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giggleman v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv00027
Plaintiff:
Craig Giggleman
Defendant:
American Honda Motor Co., Inc., Honda Motor Co., Ltd. and Honda R & D Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GIGGLEMAN v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv60655
Plaintiff:
ARLEEN M. GIGGLEMAN
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, PITTSBURGH-CORNING CORPORATION, ACANDS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
