Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Gills v. Selene Finance LP
as 2:2020cv02125
Defendant:
Selene Finance LP
Not Classified By Court:
Clerk W. Aaron Hall
Plaintiff:
Joyce Gills
Gill v. Cumberland Excavation, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv01302
Defendant:
Cumberland Excavation, LLC, Bryan Krabousanos and Frank Belcher
Plaintiff:
Michael Gill
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gill v. Hamilton County Clerks et al
as 1:2018cv00255
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Gill, Jr.
Defendant:
Silverdale, Hamilton County Clerks and Hamilton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HealthStar, LLC et al v. Dynamic Vision, Inc. et al (PLR1)
as 3:2018cv00434
Defendant:
Axene Health Partners, LLC, Michael Gill, Dynamic Vision, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
HealthStar EVV, LLC and HealthStar, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Servpro Industries, Inc. v. Harinder S. Toor Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00663
Defendant:
Harinder S. Toor, Kamaljot Gill and Harinder S. Toor Construction, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Servpro Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Montoya v. West Tennessee Detention Facility et al
as 2:2018cv02349
Plaintiff:
Ramon Montoya
Defendant:
West Tennessee Detention Facility, N. Gill, Nursing Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gills et al v. Vandiver et al
as 2:2018cv02193
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Gills and Joey D Gills
Defendant:
James P Vandiver and Drew Foams Companies, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. State of Mississippi et al
as 2:2017cv02866
Plaintiff:
Anthony Robinson
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Deanne B. Saltzman, Cindy Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Chapman et al
as 2:2017cv02458
Plaintiff:
Eric Deshon Williams
Defendant:
Arvil Chapman, Hensley, Walt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
