Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Jones v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2023cv02182
Petitioner:
Cordell Glen Jones
Respondent:
Unknown Party and Unknown Hanzen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00958
Plaintiff:
Glen Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Jones v. Arbogast
as 3:2023cv03157
Plaintiff:
Glen Jones
Defendant:
Justin Arbogast
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glen Ward v. Alberto Ramirez, et al
as 21-35852
Petitioner / Appellant:
GLEN JONES WARD
Respondent / Appellee:
ALBERTO RAMIREZ, successor to Keith Yordy - former warden
Respondent:
STATE OF IDAHO, IBOC and IDOC
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv01367
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GLEN JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frederick Banks v. Republic of Sudan
as 20-6618
Respondent / Appellee:
CHAPEL HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, MAYA ENERGY and others
Petitioner:
R. KELLY, SIX HIGH SCHOOLERS, in Gary, Indiana, GLEN JONES, Pinaca, NV home and car bomber and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
FREDERICK BANKS, next friend thereto
Ward v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2020cv00141
Respondent:
IBOC, State of Idaho, IDOC and others
Petitioner:
Glen Jones Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hodgepath et al v. Sudan et al
as 3:2019cv00417
Respondent:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Police Department, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Petitioner:
Six high schoolers, Frederick Banks, Faith Hodgepath and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Glen Ward v. Bonneville County, et al
as 19-35588
Defendant / Appellee:
KELLER, Dr., BADGER MEDICAL, Contractor, TRINITY, Contractor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLEN JONES WARD
Glen Ward v. IDOC, et al
as 19-35587
Defendant / Appellee:
IDOC, DYLAN ARTEAGA, J. KELLER, #9348 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLEN JONES WARD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
