Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Hendrick et al v. City of Valier et al
as 4:2019cv00058
Defendant:
Valier Zoning Board, City of Valier, Troy Vandenbos and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hendrick and Robert Hames
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thunder v. Weber et al
as 9:2019cv00094
Respondent:
Douglas Weber, Darin Young and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Petitioner:
Barry Glenn Thunder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cox v. BNSF Railway Company
as 9:2019cv00082
Plaintiff:
Glenn L. Cox
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dickinson v. Berryhill
as 9:2018cv00151
Plaintiff:
James Glenn Dickinson
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Montana Merchandising Inc. et al v. Dave's Killer Bread, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00026
Plaintiff:
Montana Merchandising Inc. , Hinebauch Grain, Inc and OCC-O'Connor Crops and Cattle
Defendant:
Dave's Killer Bread, Inc. , Glenn Dahl , David J. Dahl and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cherry v. Glenn et al
as 6:2017cv00026
Plaintiff:
Travis Lavon Cherry
Defendant:
Terry Glenn and Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cherry v. Glenn et al
as 1:2016cv00179
Plaintiff:
Travis Lavon Cherry
Defendant:
Terry Glenn and Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wall v. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Northern Region One et al
as 9:2016cv00118
Plaintiff:
Frank Wall
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service , MT USDA Kootenai National Forest Service , David E. Schmid and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In Re Bryce Glenn Granbois
as 4:2015cv00083
Petitioner:
Bryce Glenn Granbois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Grady et al v. CenturyLink Communications, LLC
as 1:2015cv00085
Plaintiff:
Derek H. Virkus, Gail L. Sherrick, Alma Natalia Noot and others
Defendant:
CenturyLink Communications, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
