Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Glines et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv05142
Plaintiff:
Rose Naomi Glines and Danny L Glines
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated and CR Bard Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Glines et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv04153
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Rose Naomi Glines and Danny L Glines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Glines-Haney v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv01822
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Kristina M. Glines-Haney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Akira Ishiyama v. Samuel Glines et al
as 2:2016cv07725
Defendant:
Samuel M Glines, MO and Jerrold Krystoff
Plaintiff:
Akira Ishiyama, CA
Unknown:
Anne R Kerns, Shlomo S Sherman, Gary M Smith and others
Keith Amaral et al v. Google Inc.
as 5:2016cv02553
Defendant:
Google Inc.
Plaintiff:
Keith Amaral , Nanor Aghamal , Jonathon Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Ishiyama v. Glines et al
as 2:2016cv00222
Defendant:
Samuel M Glines, MO and Jerrold Krystoff, FL
Plaintiff:
Akira Ishiyama, CA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Ortiz v. Cate et al
as 3:2011cv02380
Plaintiff:
Jamal Danwell Ortiz
Defendant:
Matthew L. Cate, D. Foston, D. Stark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Amy Schneirow Fannon v. Nexicon Inc et al
as 2:2009cv07773
Plaintiff:
Amy Schneirow Fannon
Defendant:
Nexicon Inc, Sam Glines, Richard Urrea and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008at01146
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
