Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Bush Seismic Technologies, LLC v. Global Geophysical Services, Inc
as 2:2015cv01809
Plaintiff:
Bush Seismic Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Global Geophysical Services, Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Case name not on file
as 2:2015cv00237
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv01935
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Global Geophysical Services, Inc. v. Kuster et al
as 4:2015cv00016
Plaintiff:
Global Geophysical Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Louis M. Kuster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv03349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gibson v. Global Geophysical Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00735
Plaintiff:
Janice Gibson
Defendant:
Global Geophysical Services, Inc., Richard C. White, Richard A. Degner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miller et al v. Global Geophysical Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00708
Petitioner:
Dan Mancuso, William F. Drees, III, William A. Falter and others
Defendant:
UHY LLP, Yongtong Lan, P. Matthew Verghese and others
Plaintiff:
Britt Miller, Bret Gould and Billy Rinn
Consolidated Defendant:
Sean M. Gore
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Leslie Trinin and Janice Gibson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Ritz v. Global Geophysical Services Inc
as 6:2013cv01251
Plaintiff:
Richard Kevin Ritz
Defendant:
Global Geophysical Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
In Re: Global Geophysical Services, Inc.
as 2:2012cv01531
Petitioner:
Global Geophysical Services, Inc.
Claimant:
Deliner Jamal Grant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30504
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
