Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Nkrumah et al v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
Kwame Nkrumah, Shannon Nkrumah, Lula Woodson and others
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, City of New Haven, New Haven Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hydraflow Industries NZ Limited v. DOES 1-139
as 1:2022cv00962
Plaintiff:
Hydraflow Industries NZ Limited
Defendant:
DOES 1-139, aggpo001, bambus and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Nkrumah et al v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2022cv00866
Plaintiff:
Kwame Nkrumah, Shannon Nkrumah, Lula Woodson and others
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, City of New Haven, Justin Elicker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GOLDFIELD v. GEICO
as 2:2022cv00526
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth goldfield
Defendant:
GEICO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Goldfield Corporation v. Nixon et al
as 2:2021cv00301
Plaintiff:
Goldfield Corporation
Defendant:
Ronald F Nixon and Jane Doe Nixon
Feng et al v. Goldfield Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv10496
Plaintiff:
Tom Feng, George C. Feng and Stephen L. Appel
Defendant:
John P. Fazzini, The Goldfield Corporation, David P. Bicks and others
Thoden v. The Goldfield Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv06058
Defendant:
John P. Fazzini, Stephen L. Appel, The Goldfield Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Kristin Thoden
Suokko v. The Goldfield Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv10387
Defendant:
John P. Fazzini, Stephen L. Appel, The Goldfield Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Ron Suokko
Baker v. The Goldfield Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv01672
Defendant:
John P. Fazzini, The Goldfield Corporation, David P. Bicks and others
Plaintiff:
Lewis D. Baker
Mauser v. The Goldfield Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv10370
Defendant:
John P. Fazzini, Stephen L. Appel, The Goldfield Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph T. Mauser
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
