Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Handy v. North Shore Healthcare et al
as 0:2023cv02253
Plaintiff:
Lutisha Handy
Defendant:
North Shore Healthcare, Gregory Hanson, Kate Postier and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Golden Living Enterprises et al
as 8:2013cv00026
Defendant:
Anthem Blue Cross Life & Health Insurance Company, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Nebraska, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Sarah M. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00860
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GGNSC Omaha Oak Grove, LLC v. Ivan Payich
as 12-2592
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GGNSC Omaha Oak Grove, LLC, doing business as Golden Living Center of Sorensen
Defendant - Appellee:
Ivan Payich, as Special Administrator for the Estate of Nada Payich
Golden Living Center-Cozad v. Ferguson
as 4:2011mc03052
Defendant:
Florence Viola Ferguson
Plaintiff:
Golden Living Center-Cozad
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Golden Living Center-Grand Island Lakeview v. Sebelius
as 8:2011cv00119
Plaintiff:
Golden Living Center-Grand Island Lakeview
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2010cv04839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv03406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2007cv03268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
