Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 892
City of Hallandale Beach Police Officers and Firefighters Personnel Retirement Trust v. FIGS, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv08912
Plaintiff: City of Hallandale Beach Police Officers and Firefighters Personnel Retirement Trust
Defendant: FIGS, Inc., Thomas Tull, Heather Hasson and others
Petitioner: Don Paul Corbin and Mohamad Rizka
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Filing Error
as 1:2023cv00142
Defendant: Sotera Health Company, Michael Petras, Jr., Scott Leffler and others
Hoang v. ContextLogic, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv03930
Defendant: Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Stephanie Tilenius, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff: Yen Hoang, Xiaoquan Yang and Alexander De Block
Consolidated Plaintiff: Phillip Lam
Petitioner: Joel Newman and Anand Chetram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Sharma v. Rent the Runway, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06935
Plaintiff: Rajat Sharma
Defendant: Rent the Runway, Inc., Jennifer Y. Hyman, Scarlett O'Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Public Employees Retirement Association of New Mex, et al v. Anthony Earley, Jr., et al
as 22-16711
Not Classified By Court: In re: PG&E CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant: PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION OF NEW MEXICO, The Class, YORK COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE COUNTY OF YORK RETIREMENT FUND, CITY OF WARREN POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Defendant / Appellee: ANTHONY F. EARLEY, Jr., GEISHA J. WILLIAMS, NICKOLAS STAVROPOULOS and others
Defendant: PG&E CORPORATION
In re: Treasury Securities Auc
as 22-943
Plaintiff: Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Beaver County Employees' Retirement Fund, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Marc Federighi, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: Michael St. John, BNP Paribas Securities Corp., Bank of Nova Scotia, New York Agency and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: City of Pontiac Police and Fire Retirement System, On behalf of itself and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: BMO Capital Markets Corp., CIBC World Markets Corp., Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. and others
In Re PG&E Corporation Securities Litigation
as 5:2018cv03509
Defendant: Jason P. Wells, David S. Thomason, Christopher P. Johns and others
Plaintiff: David C. Weston, Public Employees Retirement Association of New Mexico, Mid-Jersey Trucking Industry & Local No. 701 Pension Fund and others
Interested Party: Ron Williams
Petitioner: Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System
Appellee: Official Committee of Tort Claimants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
SL-X IP S.A.R.L. v. Bank Of America Corporation
as 21-2697
Plaintiff / Appellant: SL-X IP S.A.R.L., SL-x Technology USA LLC, SL-x Trading Europe Ltd. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Merrill Lynch L.P. Holdings, Inc., Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corp. and others
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Credit Suisse Group AG, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and others
Naya 1740 Fund Ltd. et al v. Coupang, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08756
Plaintiff: Naya 1740 Fund Ltd., Naya Coldwater Fund, Naya Master Fund LP and others
Defendant: Coupang, Inc., Bom Suk Kim, Gaurav Anand and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Michaud v. Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC
as 0:2022cv02551
Plaintiff: Paul Michaud
Defendant: Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC doing business as Goldman Sachs Bank USA
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?