Cases 11 - 20 of 755
Jose Castellano Gonzalez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3080
Petitioner:
JOSE MANUEL CASTELLANO GONZALEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Gonzalez-Medel v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Ariel Gonzalez-Medel
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv10002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Maldonado v. Valentine et al
as 3:2023cv00672
Plaintiff:
Alexander Maldonado, Jr.
Defendant:
Anna Valentine, Steven Crawford, Hilary Rucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tovar et al v. Eldridge Farms, LLC. et al
as 2:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Alegria Tovar, Gaudencio Delgado Bautista, Ricardo Garcia Arriaga and others
Defendant:
Eldridge Farms, LLC. and Bryan L. Eldridge
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
USA v. Jorge Monteagudo
as 23-6065
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JORGE GONZALEZ MONTEAGUDO
Alexander Sandoval-Gonzalez, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3973
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER DEIBY SANDOVAL-GONZALEZ, KASANDRA LEYDI CARVAJAL-MOJIA and ALAN SANDOVAL-CARVAJAL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Melvin Gonzalez-Ayala v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3963
Petitioner:
MELVIN GONZALEZ-AYALA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Bonilla v. Watwood
as 3:2023cv01211
Petitioner:
Jose Gonzalez Bonilla
Respondent:
Brandon Watwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luther Gonzalez-Hall v. City of Dearborn, MI, et al
as 23-2023
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LUTHER D. GONZALEZ-HALL
Defendant:
CITY OF DEARBORN, MI
Defendant / Appellant:
MARVIN SANDERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
