Cases 31 - 40 of 2,607
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Gonzalez v. USA
as 1:2023cv12274
Petitioner:
Edwin Gonzalez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gonzalez-Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security - DEFENDANT
as 3:2023cv01489
Plaintiff:
Jose M Gonzalez-Rivera
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security - DEFENDANT
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez v. Pierre-Mike, et al
as 23-1774
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALBERT GONZALEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
JANAYA PIERRE-MIKE and RICARDO R. CARTER
Gonzalez v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00436
Petitioner:
Andres Marrero Gonzalez
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Acevedo-Rodriguez v. Rivera-Pagan
as 3:2023cv01467
Plaintiff:
Javier J Acevedo-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Roberto Rivera-Pagan and Ariana Gonzalez-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz-Sanchez v. Gonzalez-Seda
as 3:2023cv01463
Plaintiff:
Atty. Maritza Ortiz and Maritza Ortiz-Sanchez
Defendant:
Crisanta Gonzalez-Seda, Raul Lopez-Menendez, Dor Mari Arroyo-Carrero and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
US v. Gonzalez
as 23-1707
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
NAPOLEON GONZALEZ, a/k/a Guillermo Gonzalez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
