Cases 41 - 50 of 3,088
Nayeem GordonIn re: Nayeem Gordon
as 24-1152
Petitioner:
In re: NAYEEM GORDON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
McGee v. State of California, et al.
as 24-393
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERSON A. MCGEE
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER and others
Travers v. Cerevel Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
John Travers
Defendant:
Cerevel Therapeutics Holdings, Inc., Tony Coles, Ron Renaud and others
Haggart v. US
as 24-1256
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HAGGART, KATHY HAGGART, Husband and Wife, For Themselves and As Representatives of a Class of Similarly Situated Persons, GORDON ARTHUR WOODLEY, Personal Counsel for Kittinger Deed Claimants and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENISE LYNN WOODLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08636
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
GORDON v. USA
as 1:2023cv02035
Plaintiff:
DARRYL JEROME GORDON and DARYL JEROME GORDON
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Gordon et al v. Cowtown Express Logistics LLC et al
as 1:2023cv09245
Plaintiff:
Niccol Gordon
Defendant:
Cowtown Express Logistics LLC, Carrier 411 Services Inc. and Will Ruddick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gordon P. Jones v. Cope-Land Touring, Inc. et al
as 2:2024mc00003
Debtor:
North Florida Productions, LLC
Plaintiff:
Gordon P. Jones
Petitioner:
P.C. Liang
Defendant:
Cope-Land Touring, Inc.
North Florida Productions, LLC et al v. Beige Curtain, Inc. et al
as 2:2024mc00004
Debtor:
North Florida Productions, LLC
Plaintiff:
Gordon P. Jones
Petitioner:
P. C. Liang
Defendant:
Beige Curtain, Inc. and Neon Trees, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
