Cases 21 - 30 of 617
GOWER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19966
Plaintiff:
VICKI GOWER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Read v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2022cv01363
Plaintiff:
Lacy Erin Read
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Colette Peters, Heidi Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Osborne v. Collette Peters, et al
as 22-35663
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM FRANK OSBORNE
Defendant / Appellee:
COLLETTE PETERS, ODOC Director, MICHAEL GOWER, ODOC Assistant Director of Operations, MARK NOOTH, ODOC East Side Institution Administrator and others
GOWER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11489
Plaintiff:
ZACHEREY KENT GOWER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Mounce v. Vitt et al
as 3:2022cv00914
Plaintiff:
Heather Mae Mounce
Defendant:
Paul Charles Vitt, Tim Causey, Mike Gower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Synergy Investing, LLC v. Gowers
as 1:2022cv02299
Plaintiff:
Synergy Investing, LLC
Defendant:
a.r. Robin Gowers and Robin D. Gowers
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Pinsky v. Peters et al
as 6:2022cv00781
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Pinsky
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Heidi Steward, Michael Gower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelley v. Peters et al
as 6:2022cv00669
Plaintiff:
Tanner Elliott Shelley
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Heidi Steward, Brian Belleque and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Maney, et al v. State of Oregon, et al
as 22-80033
Respondent:
PAUL JULIAN MANEY, GARY CLIFT, GEORGE W. NULPH and others
Petitioner:
STATE OF OREGON, KATE BROWN, COLETTE PETERS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
