Cases 1 - 10 of 2,341
Gibson v. Grant
as 24-1086
Plaintiff:
DONALD GIBSON
Defendant:
Police Officer TERIQ C. GRANT, Shield No. 12175, Detective RYAN OLSEN, Shield #5992 and JOHN DOE, Kings County District Attorney (ADA)
Rosa v. Cook
as 24-1101
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant:
MICHELLE BIELA, SANTORO, HENRY MUSHI and others
Salem v. Burns et al
as 1:2024cv21509
Plaintiff:
Skylar Salem
Defendant:
William Burns, Chicago Police, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Saintillus v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2493
Plaintiff:
CHALONER SAINTILLUS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PHILLIP A. TALBERT, GRANT RABENN and others
Daniel Grant v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03141
Plaintiff:
Daniel Grant
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
North Metro Harness Initiative LLC v. Beattie et al
as 0:2024cv01369
Plaintiff:
North Metro Harness Initiative LLC doing business as Running Aces
Defendant:
Michael Beattie, Craig Beaulieu, Raymond Brenny and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BRAXTON-GRANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. USA
as 1:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
BRAXTON-GRANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
FORD v. MERCER et al
as 2:2024cv04894
Defendant:
TINGO GROUP, INC., DARREN MERCER, HAO CHEN and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORD
In re Ex Parte Application of Gregory Gliner et al
as 3:2024mc80087
Plaintiff:
In re Ex Parte Application of Gregory Gliner and For an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 Granting Leave to Obtain Discovery for Use in Foreign Proceedings
Christopher Jarvis et al v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00785
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jarvis, Christopher Bajwa, Ronald Belanger and others
Defendant:
Mazda Motor of America, Inc. and Mazda Motor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
