Cases 81 - 90 of 101
Griggs v. Culliver
as 1:2008cv00320
Petitioner:
Arthur Lee Griggs
Respondent:
Grantt Culliver
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McConico v. Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles et al (INMATE3)
as 2:2008cv00415
Plaintiff:
James McConico, Jr.
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles, Troy King and Grantt Culliver
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barksdale v. Culliver (DEATH PENALTY)
as 3:2008cv00327
Plaintiff:
Tony Barksdale, Tony Barksdale, Tony Barksdale and others
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Reese v. Culliver et al
as 2:2008cv00697
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Reese
Respondent:
Grantt Culliver and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Perry v. Gandy et al
as 1:2008cv00185
Plaintiff:
Wayne Demetric Perry
Defendant:
Charlene Gandy, Grantt Culliver, Shirley Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shabazz v. Culliver et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2008cv00088
Plaintiff:
Ash-ShaKur Shabazz
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Means v. Culliver et al
as 2:2007cv02326
Petitioner:
Kendell Cottrell Means
Respondent:
Grantt Culliver and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dill v. Allen et al
as 2:2007cv02239
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Dill
Defendant:
Richard Allen and Grantt Culliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Culliver et al
as 2:2007cv02186
Petitioner:
Maurice Jackson
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivers v. Culliver et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2007cv00894
Plaintiff:
Wallace Rivers
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
