Cases 11 - 20 of 65
Diatek Licensing LLC v. Gray Television, Inc.
as 6:2022cv00901
Plaintiff:
Diatek Licensing LLC
Defendant:
Gray Television, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Wilson v. South Carolina Law Enforcement Division et al
as 4:2022cv02312
Plaintiff:
Ralph Wilson, Jr Personally and as Agent/Owner/Operator of Ralph Wilson Law PC d/b/a Ralph Wilson Law Firm, LLC agent of Ralph Wilson Law PC doing business as Ralph Wilson Jr Law Firm PC
Defendant:
South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, Ashley Jolda, Kevin Strickland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Mango v. Gray Television, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00737
Plaintiff:
Gregory P. Mango
Defendant:
Gray Television, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Engel v. Gray Television Inc.
as 1:2021cv03069
Plaintiff:
Mr. Noel John Paul Engel
Defendant:
Gray Television Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GRAY TELEVISION, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv02041
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
GRAY TELEVISION, INC. and QUINCY MEDIA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
McLaughlin v. Darlington County et al
as 4:2021cv01504
Defendant:
Darlington County, Officer Corey McLaurin, South Carolina Law Enforcement Division and others
Plaintiff:
David Quintel McLaughlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Philpot v. Gray Television, Inc.
as 1:2020cv04093
Plaintiff:
Larry G. Philpot
Defendant:
Gray Television, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
