Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Marshall et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00458
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Charles C Marshall, George P Keary, Mark Kellianen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
v. Johnson et al
as 5:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Keith Dimitri Johnson
Defendant:
Mr. Merrick Garland, Mrs. C. S. Peters, Mr. C. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MIMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv06943
Plaintiff:
JASON GREGORY MIMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mitchell v. Skinner et al
as 5:2022cv00012
Defendant:
Officer Pitt, Vernon Byrd, R. Skinner and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wayne Johnson v. Hackney
as 21-7040
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WAYNE THOMAS JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER HACKNEY, GREGORY MIMS and HUDGINS, Warden
Johnson v. Hackney et al
as 5:2021cv00090
Plaintiff:
Wayne Thomas Johnson
Defendant:
Officer Hackney, Hudgins and Gregory Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Crespo v. Soule et al
as 5:2021cv00228
Defendant:
FNU Blueming, M. Martin, Mark Pleiss and others
Plaintiff:
David A Crespo, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Mims et al
as 5:2021cv00039
Plaintiff:
Wayne Thomas Johnson
Defendant:
Gregory Mims, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edward Nellson v. John Doe
as 21-6206
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, Warden of USP Hazelton, LEIGH BIRD, JOHN DOE, SHU Lt at USP Hazelton and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD NELLSON
Lewis v. Adams, Warden et al
as 5:2021cv00015
Defendant:
Nurse L. Bird, Director Michael Carvajal, P. Adams, Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Tonia L. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
