Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Johnson #753595 v. Lopez et al
as 1:2023cv00872
Plaintiff:
Darren Deon Johnson #753595
Defendant:
Unknown Lopez, Unknown Griffith, Unknown Sprague and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith Mustin v. Lyneal Wainwright, et al
as 23-3671
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH MUSTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
LYNEAL WAINWRIGHT, Warden, in her individual and official capacity, RANDON WATSON, in his individual capacity, BLAIR SMITH, in his individual and official capacity and others
Interested Party:
STATE OF OHIO
Grooms v. Cox et al
as 2:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Cedric Jordan Grooms, Sr.
Defendant:
Casey Cox, Tim Clafflin, John Griffith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffith v. Warden
as 2:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Timothy Griffith
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shaffer v. Griffith
as 1:2023cv00398
Petitioner:
Michelle Maree Shaffer
Respondent:
Erin Griffith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Williams v. Griffith et al
as 1:2023cv00646
Plaintiff:
Russell Anthony Williams
Defendant:
Sidney R. Griffith, Samantha Griffith, Boyd Benson Griffith, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Byrd #682089 v. Bennett et al
as 1:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
Gerald Byrd #682089
Defendant:
Unknown Bennett, Garrett Griffiths and Unknown Burrows
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fluker v. Dunn
as 2:2023cv10617
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lynn Fluker, Jr
Defendant:
Bryan Dunn, J. Hule, Colsan and others
Griffiths v. Garza
as 4:2023cv00199
Petitioner:
Andrew Griffiths
Respondent:
Warden Fernando Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Doe v. Griffith et al
as 2:2022cv12390
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Griffith, Todd Redman, K. Napier and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
