Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Elabanjo v. Griffith et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Samantha Elabanjo
Defendant:
B. W. Griffith and Lawrence Capps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GRIFFITH v. OFFICIALS AT ANSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 1:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
MELISSA ANN GRIFFITH
Defendant:
OFFICIALS AT ANSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIFFITH v. UNKNOWN OFFICIALS AT ANSON CORRECTIONAL
as 1:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
MELISSA ANN GRIFFITH
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICIALS AT ANSON CORRECTIONAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith v. Federal Prisons Director of B.O.P. et al
as 5:2023ct03325
Plaintiff:
Anin M. Keith and Anin Michael Keith
Defendant:
Federal Prisons Director of B.O.P., Collette Peters, Warden Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Griffith v. Warden
as 5:2023hc02184
Plaintiff:
Timothy Griffith
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Griffith v. Warden
as 5:2023ct03230
Plaintiff:
Timothy Griffith
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Griffith v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01098
Plaintiff:
Mark Griffith
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Huff v. Thomas et al
as 5:2023ct03163
Plaintiff:
Peter D. Huff
Defendant:
Nurse Thomas, Nurse Griffith, Sgt. Barnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huff v. Thomas et al
as 5:2023ct03139
Plaintiff:
Peter D. Huff
Defendant:
Nurse Thomas, Nurse Griffith, Sgt. Barnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
