Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Griffith et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00813
Plaintiff:
Jalon D. Jackson
Defendant:
Charlette Griffith, Louis Colley, Terri Mathis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Nixon (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00642
Plaintiff:
Griffith Alfred Jones
Defendant:
Autauga County Metro Jail and Larry Nixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shortz v. City of Phenix City, Alabama et al (MAG+)
as 3:2019cv00840
Defendant:
John Downs, Wallace Hunter, Eddie Lowe and others
Plaintiff:
James H. Shortz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffith et al v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00723
Defendant:
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., Shepherd A. Odom, M.D., P.C., Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Ralph Allen Griffith and Bessie Griffith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Broadhead v. Roders et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00371
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
E. Roders, Officer Holincey, Earnestine Sanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Roders et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00321
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
LPN Roders, Officer Holincey, Earnestine Sanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Jenkins et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00250
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Captain Jenkins, Rene Mason, Warden Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Harris et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00244
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
E. Harris, Officer Holincey, Correctional Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00689
Plaintiff:
Jason Jermaine Hall
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Cam Ward, Mike Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
