Cases 1 - 10 of 19
GRUEL CARRASCOSA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12701
Plaintiff:
ALFREDO GRUEL CARRASCOSA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
The Estate of Zoey Chafer v. Sawyer County et al
as 3:2023cv00379
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Zoey Chafer
Defendant:
Sawyer County, Karla Kay, Ruth Anne Gillmor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baer et al v. Tesla Motors, Inc.
as 4:2023cv02274
Plaintiff:
Elijah Baer, Joshua Bayangos, Ronald Gruel and others
Defendant:
Tesla Motors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Joni Gruel v. Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00460
Plaintiff:
JONI GRUEL
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 25, Inclusive, BLAZIN WINGS, INC., DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Southern Electrical Retirement Fund v. Gruel et al
as 3:2018cv00585
Defendant:
Camryn Elizabeth Lawhorne and Christina Gruel
Plaintiff:
Southern Electrical Retirement Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Gustafson et al v. Gruel et al
as 1:2017cv11401
Plaintiff:
Lee Gustafson and Victor Donati
Defendant:
Andrew Gruel, Jethro Naude, 10 Fare LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Thompson v. Renner et al
as 1:2017cv01255
Plaintiff:
Turrell Thompson
Defendant:
. Renner, James Berry, Michael Carlock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Allsup v. Shelton et al
as 1:2017cv01207
Plaintiff:
Brandon Allsup
Defendant:
A Shelton, Pyle, Gruel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roman v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2017cv01195
Plaintiff:
Luis Roman
Defendant:
John R Baldwin, Micheal P Melvin, Susan Prentice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. Dryzelle et al
as 1:2017cv01120
Plaintiff:
Jamale Douglas
Defendant:
Dryzelle, . Gruel, . Fike and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
