Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Barnes v. Guild Mortgage Company LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01792
Plaintiff:
Nikita Lynette Barnes
Defendant:
Guild Mortgage Company LLC and McCalla, Raymer Liebert Pierce, LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Nikita Barnes v. Guild Mortgage/ Guild Holding, et al
as 24-10676
Plaintiff:
NIKITA LYNETTE BARNES
Defendant:
GUILD MORTGAGE/ GUILD HOLDING and DESIREE KRAMER
King v. Guild Mortgage Co. LLC
as 4:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Ky-Anna J King
Defendant:
Guild Mortgage Co. LLC and Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
SEELY v. GUILD MORTGAGE CO LLC
as 2:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
JAMES SEELY
Defendant:
GUILD MORTGAGE CO LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
King D'Arezzo v. Guild Mortgage
as 1:2023cv00242
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lee King D'Arezzo
Defendant:
Guild Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guild Mortgage Company LLC v. Flowers et al
as 2:2023cv01955
Plaintiff:
Guild Mortgage Company LLC
Other:
Christopher Jordan Flowers
Defendant:
Cory Flynn and Lisa Jolliffe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Coit et al v. Guild Mortgage Company LLC
as 4:2023cv01247
Plaintiff:
Roland Coit and Pamela Coit
Defendant:
Guild Mortgage Company LLC
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Davis v. Century Communities Inc. Co. LLC et al
as 1:2023cv05485
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Davis
Defendant:
Century Communities Inc. Co. LLC, Guild Mortgage Company, Georgia Power Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
