Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Harpo-Brown v. Intermark Management Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00176
Defendant:
Brookfield Properties, LLC, John De Foor, II, Robert McBurney and others
Plaintiff:
Wihly Harpo-Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BOWEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv10135
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WAYNE H BOWEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCray v. Roscoe's Bar et al
as 6:2019cv01241
Defendant:
Roscoe's Bar, Jorge L. Hernaiz-Vega, Zahaid Miha and others
Plaintiff:
Willie James McCray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willie McCray v. Roscoe's Bar, et al
as 19-11071
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLY H. BOWEN, individually and in work capacity, ROSCOE'S BAR, individually and in work capacity, JORGE L. HERNAIZ-VEGA, individually and in work capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIE JAMES MCCRAY
McCray v. Roscoe's Bar et al
as 6:2019cv00352
Defendant:
Kimberly H. Bowen, Jorge L. Hernaiz-Vega, Zahaid Miha and others
Plaintiff:
Willie James McCray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2019cv00127
Defendant:
No Named Defendant, Joshua Stevenson Weimer, Sterrett (I) and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius T. Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Creel v. Eddie Bowen, et al
as 17-60434
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES WALTER CREEL
Defendant - Appellee:
EDDIE H. BOWEN, JIM HOOD, DANIAL C. JONES and others
James Creel v. Jaquelyn Banks, et al
as 17-60221
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES WALTER CREEL
Respondent - Appellee:
JAQUELYN BANKS, Superintendent, Southern Mississippi Correctional Institution and EDDIE H. BOWEN
Creel v. Bowen et al
as 2:2017cv00030
Plaintiff:
James Walter Creel
Defendant:
Eddie H. Bowen, Jim Hood, Danial C. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Creel v. Banks et al
as 2:2017cv00029
Plaintiff:
James Walter Creel
Defendant:
Jaqualin Banks and Eddie H. Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
