Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Jackson v. Harlow et al
as 5:2018cv00035
Plaintiff:
Keith Jackson
Defendant:
David L. Harlow, Scott Parker, Rob Pettit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Harlow et al
as 5:2018ct03029
Plaintiff:
Keith Jackson
Defendant:
David L. Harlow, Scott Parker, Rob Pettit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillard v. Perry et al
as 5:2017ct03119
Plaintiff:
Thomas T. Dillard, Jr.
Defendant:
Frank Perry, W. David Guice, George Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillard v. Perry et al
as 5:2016ct03329
Plaintiff:
Thomas T. Dillard, Jr.
Defendant:
Frank Perry, W. David Guice, George Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv00861
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH H. SMITH
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Boyer et al v. Hankook Tire Co., Ltd. et al
as 3:2014cv00563
Plaintiff:
Marvin L. Boyer, Sandra T Boyer, Benny R. Elledge and others
Defendant:
Hankook Tire Co., Ltd. , Hankook Tire America Corporation and John B. Ostwalt, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Kornegay v. Smith et al
as 5:2013hc02198
Petitioner:
Roger G. Kornegay
Respondent:
Carson H. Smith, Jr and Capt. Jones
Defendant:
Joseph C. Bowman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Lewis et al
as 5:2012ct03013
Plaintiff:
Charles H. Smith
Defendant:
Robert C. Lewis, Alvin W. Keller, Jr., Faye Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Pender County Sheriff's Office and Jail et al
as 5:2009ct03203
Plaintiff:
Dennis Williams
Defendant:
Pender County Sheriff's Office and Jail, Carson H. Smith, Jr, D.L. Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
