Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Harris v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons, et al
as 1:2019cv22887
Defendant:
Prison Guard, Official, Assistant Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Marberry, et al
as 1:2019cv22891
Defendant:
Prison Guard, Official, Assistant Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Venkataram v. United States Bureau of Prison et al
as 1:2016cv24502
Plaintiff:
Natarajan Venkataram
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prison , Thomas R. Kane, H.J. Marberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Samuels et al.
as 5:2013cv00488
Plaintiff:
David Christopher Williams
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Harley G. Lappin, Scott A. Middlebrooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Byner v. Marberry et al
as 5:2010cv01705
Petitioner:
Demetrius Cornae Byner
Respondent:
H.J. Marberry, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Alabama and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MCINTOSH v. GLEN et al
as 1:2009cv00295
Plaintiff:
CHARLES T. MCINTOSH
Defendant:
GLEN, RODNEY SMITH, DERRICK MEBANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SILVA v. MARBERRY
as 1:2007cv00342
Petitioner:
EDWIN SILVA
Respondent:
H.J. MARBERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
WARE v. MARBERRY
as 1:2007cv00300
Petitioner:
JAMIE WARE
Respondent:
H.J. MARBERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ROBINSON v. MARBERRY
as 1:2007cv00244
Petitioner:
RONNIE ROBINSON
Respondent:
H.J. MARBERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
CONNOR v. MARBERRY
as 1:2007cv00236
Petitioner:
DANIEL CONNOR
Respondent:
H.J. MARBERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
