Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Cornelius v. Hangzhou Great Star Industrial Co., LTD et al
as 2:2024cv02054
Plaintiff:
Catherine Cornelius
Defendant:
Hangzhou Great Star Industrial Co., LTD, Great Star Industrial USA, LLC and HAAS Outdoors, Inc
Not Yet Classified:
Jamita Swearengen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Audemars Piguet Holdings, S.A. v. Haas Outdoors, Inc. et al
as 1:2020mc00813
Plaintiff:
Audemars Piguet Holdings, S.A.
Petitioner:
QuestionPro, Inc.
Defendant:
Haas Outdoors, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv12375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Haas Outdoors, Inc. v. Dryshod International, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00978
Plaintiff:
Haas Outdoors, Inc.
Defendant:
Dryshod International, LLC and James K. Donohue
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Dryshod International, LLC et al v. Haas Outdoors, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00596
Plaintiff:
James K. Donohue and Dryshod International, LLC
Defendant:
William Sugg, Toxey Haas and Haas Outdoors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Haas Outdoors, Inc. v. Dryshod International, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00024
Plaintiff:
Haas Outdoors, Inc.
Defendant:
Dryshod International, LLC and James K. Donohue
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
FILING ERROR
as 1:2018cv00058
Defendant:
James K Donohue and Dryshod International, LLC
Plaintiff:
HAAS OUTDOORS, INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Haas Outdoors, Inc. v. Dryshod International, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00057
Defendant:
James K Donohue and Dryshod International, LLC
Plaintiff:
Haas Outdoors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Haas Outdoors, Inc. v. Wells
as 1:2017cv00066
Plaintiff:
Haas Outdoors, Inc.
Defendant:
John W. Wells, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Haas Outdoors, Inc. v. NTA Enterprise, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00089
Plaintiff:
Haas Outdoors, Inc.
Defendant:
NTA Enterprise, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
