Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 115
HAMPTON v. USA
as 1:2023cv01913
Petitioner: DONTA L. HAMPTON
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
JOHNSON v. FACEBOOK et al
as 1:2023cv01560
Plaintiff: ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant: FACEBOOK, META, RUDY GUILIANI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hampton v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00558
Petitioner: James B Hampton
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HAMPTON v. AMERICREW, INC.
as 4:2023cv00083
Plaintiff: JASON HAMPTON
Defendant: AMERICREW, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Type: Labor Labor: Other
HAMPTON v. WALMART
as 1:2023cv00524
Plaintiff: DEIVORY HAMPTON
Defendant: WALMART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00075
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00348
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
NAPIER v. RICHMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv00297
Plaintiff: JAMES BLAKE NAPIER
Defendant: RICHMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT, WILLIAM HAMPTON, KAYLA REICHNET and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hampton v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00885
Petitioner: Edward M Hampton and Edward Mitchell Hampton
Respondent: Warden
Not Classified By Court: MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only) and WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hampton v. Wilson
as 1:2022cv00302
Plaintiff: Edward M Hampton and Edward Mitchell Hampton
Defendant: Ashley Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?