Cases 1 - 10 of 219
CARNEVALE v. CLARK et al
as 2:2019cv00842
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, MICHAEL HARLOW, ALLEGHENY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY and others
Petitioner:
DANIEL THOMAS CARNEVALE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PACE et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv00756
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL CHAD, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE #1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
LILLIAN PACE, DONTE WRIGHT and CORTNEY GUYTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kennedy v. Swartz et al
as 3:2018cv02034
Defendant:
Sergent Swartz, C/O Harlow, Deb Alvore and others
Plaintiff:
Ira Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Communication Management Services, LLC et al v. Brooks Harlow, Attorney at Law
as 3:2017mc00572
Plaintiff:
In Re: Communication Management Services, LLC
Defendant:
Brooks Harlow, Attorney at Law
Movant:
Richard D. Gaines
ALLEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
JACK E. ALLEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ERIC HOLDER, LORETTA LYNCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burton v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2016cv01953
Plaintiff:
Niara Burton
Defendant:
John Wetzel , Brenda Tritt , Trevor Winguard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cuadra v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2016cv00008
Petitioner:
Harlow Cuadra
Respondent:
John E. Wetzel , Vince Mooney and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TAYLOR et al v. HYLTON et al
as 2:2015cv05894
Plaintiff:
VERONICA TAYLOR , KAREEM CURRY , VERNON CURRY and others
Defendant:
STACIA A. HYLTON, DAVID L. HARLOW and UNITED STATES MARSHALS JOHN AND/OR JANE DOES #1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KNOX V. WETZEL et al
as 1:2015cv00078
Plaintiff:
RANDY KNOX
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MICHAEL HARLOW, MARK BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knox v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2015cv00466
Plaintiff:
Randy Knox
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Michael Harlow, Mark Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
